Monday, April 22, 2013

Shobdo: For Art’s Sake



It’s been ages since a meaningful Bengali film was made, where art and philosophy blended seamlessly. Shobdo (Sound) is indisputably one of the greatest Bengali films made in recent times. Such a claim might sound too lofty, but certainly not without foundation. Why is Shobdo unique?
·          1. The trend of films on the film industry has taken over Tollygunj for quite sometimes now. While most filmmakers have stuck to the major players (directors, actors or musicians), none has thought it necessary to bring to the fore the technicians. The foley-artistes’ indispensability has never been recognized. And am certain, even cine-lovers have barely ever spared a thought on them. Kaushik Ganguly’s Shobdo makes out of the ignored foley-artiste a hero, and hammers home the fact that without him films would have been but unreal. For, without sounds, verisimilitude cannot be achieved. A fact, which I am sure, has eluded many till date.
·         2. It’s been really long since any Bengali film has delved deep into the psyche of an artiste, and has represented creative madness with such compassion. Tarak’s obsession with his art segregates him from reality much to the disconcertment of his wife and psychiatrist, but Tarak is so overpoweringly fascinated with his art that he fails to separate his art and reality. For him, his art (the world of sounds) becomes reality. Without being preachy, the film floats a profound philosophical discourse on artistry, creative impulse, and how art might enslave life. It might be painful for those to whom the artiste is personally consequential; but, such coalescence of art and life is necessary for creation to approximate perfection.
·         3. Shobdo, therefore, becomes a very refined commentary on filmmaking and its penchant to approximate the reality it represents. The re-creation of sound effects demands of the foley-artiste a very alert ear for the various sounds, no matter how subsonic they are ---- the fine difference in the little ‘thud’ sound made by an empty cup and a cup filled to the brim; the difference of the sound of footsteps on a wooden staircase and the sound made by boots on a gravelled path, etc. Shobdo makes you feel that if a good screenplay is the backbone of a good film, the foley-artiste’s sound effects are like blood that runs through the arteries and veins of that screenplay. The behind-the-scene reality of a ‘show’ is unravelled by Shobdo remarkably.
·         4. The film, while celebrating creative madness, romantically evokes the superiority of the sounds of nature to human speech. The tearful psychiatrist wonders after a night of hard-partying the general inconsequentiality of human speech, which is more often than not, nonsensical and insensitive, and mostly meaningless. Sound waves are not sounds, but mere signifiers which the human brain interprets meaningfully, as it is trained to. While language often dominates in this world of sounds, the ‘mere’ sounds too are no less significant, no less meaningful than language. Kaushik Ganguly has commendably touched such depths without being preachy anywhere.
·        5.  The film also negotiates with ideas of ‘normality’ and that which is dubbed ‘abnormal’ by the mainstream. Tarak’s strangeness (his inability to interpret human speech and his obsession with other kinds of sounds) is eventually reclaimed as another way of looking at things, a perspective (largely auditory, if I may call it so) which is not available to the majority. Yet, Tarak has to come back to the mainstream of life; so, he is finally sent to a rehab. The ear-splitting sound of the ambulance struggling over a sandy beach, acquires a different meaning altogether in the closing scene. Is it a signifier of Tarak’s protest as he stares on silently with a blank look in his eyes? By the time the end-titles roll, the audience becomes much too aware of all the other sounds they hear, apart from the dialogue.
    

      Ritwick Chakraborty’s marvellous performance would definitely fetch him numerous awards and accolades in the coming year, although it’s surprising that he has missed the national award. Raima and Srijit are good, if not brilliant. Churni would have scored really high had she not given the same performance in numerous other films before. Victor Banerjee is quite redundant to the plot.
      Kaushik Ganguly is certainly emerging as one of the greatest filmmakers of contemporary Tollywood. The uniqueness of his subjects is commendable and is a great relief from the tear-jerking sentimental middle class dramas or nerve-racking action-packages that have almost destroyed the Bengali film industry. Shobdo is a film from which other promising filmmakers might draw inspiration and abandon tested ground, and tread on un-trodden path. By taking the ‘road not usually taken’ Kaushik Ganguly deserves two-thumbs-up! 

Image courtesy:

1 comment:

Subhankar said...

This might bring in an altogether new experience of 'hearing' films as opposed to just 'seeing' them. A commendable effort, and Kaushik Ganguly is certainly the most fearlessly original filmmaker in this city. Ritwik took me by surprise...I had no idea that he could be so good. Thanks for the review! I enjoyed Ar Ekti Premer Golpo but had no idea that KG would fellow them up with subjects as diverse as Rang Milanti, Laptop, Shabdo. Cant wait to watch Saswata in 'C/O Sir' and Parambrata in/as Subeer Banerjee in 'Apur Panchali'. Even whilst on combined projects, he(along with Anjan Dutt, in the 'Progress Report' section in Ek Mutho Chhobi) had left his mark, and on television with 'Ushnatar Jonno' and a telefilm on revisiting Charulata(Ghare o Bairey) with Madhabi and wife Churni (a perhaps regrettable fixture in all his projects). This was till he began his big screen innings with Waarish(in 2004) and Shunyo E Buke (which I am yet to watch) and zany city comedies like Jackpot and Brake Fail.
AEPG was the beginning of a new chapter for Bengali cinema(its a wonder how it missed out at the National Awards and mush lesser films on the same subject like 'Memories in March' and 'Chitrangada' won), and KG has not disappointed since then. His comic timing as an actor is excellent, and I enjoyed watching his brief appearances in Anjan Dutt's Chalo Lets Go, Antaheen and his own Shabdo (which he proudly claims no other actor in this country could have done). I would think there are very few contemporary directors in the country today who can match him in conception and sheer range, even in this brief career span. Suman Mukhopadhyay dabbles in one version of realism whereas Aniruddha Roy Choudhury's canvas is like an air-brushed music video. Keep the veterans aside, and Kaushik Ganguly gives cinephiles like us much reason to hope, for better and bolder (and I dont mean just sexually but in terms of representing a whole range of content that gets written out of the screen) Bangla cinema in years to come.